Science

December 15, 2006

Where’s the Technology?

Where’s the Technology?
The last ten years of medical advance has promised again and again the ability for physicians to remotely examine and even treat their patients.  Federal government states and universities have spent that millions of dollars in the development of examination stations and “robots” to provide stereo two-way voice communication, stereoscopic video and even remote stethoscope capability to patient bedsides in remote hospital communities.  This new science of telemedicine has brought advances to hospital and emergency room based medicine for those remote communities.

But what about the average consumer?  The coming pandemic looms ominously on horizon.  But this ominous shadow may actually be a new dawn for telemedicine. 

The SARS outbreak in Toronto and Singapore proved that quarantine does not work but that “Social Distancing” does.  The message in Toronto was clear and simple.  “Don’t go to hospitals and healthcare institutions unless you want to catch SARS.  That’s where the SARS is.”  In Toronto it worked.  The SARS epidemic fizzled out after only a few short weeks of social distancing. 

But in the United States, emergency rooms, hospitals and urgent care centers are the destination for the treatment of after-hours illnesses and sudden onsets of the flu.  Pandemic flu will strike like a blitzkrieg across the world.  People will fall ill in a matter of hours not days.  Doctors’ offices will be overflowing with the sick and those who are afraid that they will become sick.  The default will be the urgent care centers emergency rooms and hospitals of the nation.  This is where the disease will be concentrated and like with SARS in Toronto this is where it will be most likely that you will become ill.

Here’s where telemedicine has the advantage, if somebody, anybody can produce a telemedicine technology solution within a reasonable price range for the average consumer to buy.  What would be needed would be a high resolution web camera and a simple handheld stethoscope-like device that could produce high fidelity sound in real time.  A web based portal for physicians would also be needed.  The examination would need to be completable in real time. 

Imagine a simple device with a webcam and a modified microphone similar to that already found on electronic stethoscopes used by physicians coupled with an electronic blood pressure cuff. Now imagine this device providing information in real time to the physician a rudimentary medical examination, a kind of “telemedicine triage.” With this consumer priced equipment, an examination could be performed and basic healthcare decisions such as the need for home healthcare nursing, antiviral medication prescriptions, or simple chicken soup could be made.  This “telemedicine triage” would ensure that only the sickest of the sick would go to the hospital guaranteeing that the spread of the disease was decreased because fewer people would be sent home from the hospital not sick, but now contaminated. 

Of course Medicare, Medicaid and other healthcare insurances would have to begin to actually pay physicians to perform telemedicine services.  While the codes exist reimbursement is slow and difficult.  Telemedicine takes more time than a regular examination and time does have a value.

Will anybody step up to the plate?  That depends on demand for “telemedicine triage” by the public, the demand for a consumer telemedicine product and, unfortunately, the ability of physicians to get paid for what they do. On the other hand, the cost if telemedicine triage does not become is that the future pandemic will rage on.

December 09, 2006

What a Great Idea!!!

Kevin Freking, of the Associated Press reports on the first major corporate sponsorship of portable electronic medical records. Applied Materials, BP America, Inc., Intel Corp., Pitney Bowes and Wal-Mart will enroll employees in a central database to maintain health records in an effort to eliminate duplication, omission and error.

This is a concept that is supported by President Bush and the National Academy of Science - Institute of Medicine. Not only with the system collect medical record information and reports to a central repository, but individuals will be able to provide personal and family information to augment the record. This type of system is envisioned by the Whitehouse as a national standard by 2014 and is a requirement for implementation by medial providers by 2008. The problem with this on-line repository database is that it is internet dependent and while accessible from any internet portal, it is not truly portable. You cannot carry it self contained in your hand.

But, what if there were a way to carry a copy of such vital data in the palm of your and, or in a watch, wristband, pocket card, etc.?

W. David Stephenson of Stevenson Strategies made a fantastic suggestion in his September 26, 2006 blog entry. He suggested that people carry their medical records on secure U3 enabled USB drives. Such devices are already imbedded in credit card sized wallet drives, wrist watches, necklaces, key rings, pens and every manner of business sundry.

As an Emergency Room physician, I'm not sure I would look for a USB drive in the pockets of a patient in the emergency room, but a USB drive watch, wrist and, pendent or wallet card would be useful. What a wonderful merger of form and function that could now save your life! David ends with the statement:

"This sounds like a real win-win technology that hits my sweet spot: convenient and usable every day (no more lugging laptops home from the office!), and, in a disaster, a literal and figurative lifesaver, because you'd not only have your medical records in hand, but also all of your critical applications and business files as well. It wouldn't be ideal, but, in a worst case, you'd still be able to do limited business if you had access to a shared computer in a shelter -- and, for emergency workers themselves, smart drives are going to be essential supplies."

Currently there are 8 companies selling a solution similar to what David is suggesting. Unfortunately, none of these take advantage of the U3 technology David describes. One of the 8 companies is planning a U3 version in 6 months. Although all 8 companies claim password protection for the user interface, only one of the systems uses encryption to safeguard the data files from direct access by other software.

Also needed is the ability to ensure that the patient does not deliberately or accidentally alter the records, especially if they record includes notes from medical professionals as several of the systems do. Another nice feature would be the ability to synchronize with the electronic medical record (EMR) at the doctor's office. Here, the existence of the type of central repository described in Kevin's report serves not only as a primary data source, but an ideal back-up for the USB data.

There are a few problems that are still to be addressed including ISO-9000/CMS-EMR standards compatibility and linking to the coming central medical records repository, but one company is already cracking that nut too.

All in all, Kevin & David propose a great idea!

Kevin's article can be read at: http://www.wilmingtonstar.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20061207/NEWS/612070357&SearchID=73265339316299

David's complete blog entry can be read through the permalink: http://stephensonstrategies.com/categories/profitableCorporatePreparedness/2006/09/26.html#a9

My Photo

Your email address:


Powered by FeedBlitz

Dr. Ramirez Live!

Disaster Widget

  • Get this widget from Widgetbox
Blog powered by TypePad